A ceramic PCB for a SiC power module typically costs $8–$60 per unit at production volumes (500+ pcs), depending on substrate material, metallization process, and board complexity. That range is wide because the choices you make at the design stage—AlN vs. Si₃N₄, DBC vs. AMB, copper thickness—each shift the price by 30–200%. Understanding where the money goes lets you spec the right substrate without over-engineering or under-budgeting.
SiC devices switch faster and run hotter than silicon IGBTs—junction temperatures of 175–200 °C are common, and some SiC MOSFETs are rated to 250 °C. The ceramic substrate must handle that thermal load, match the CTE of the die, and survive aggressive thermal cycling. Each requirement adds cost.
Five factors account for roughly 85% of the unit price:

| Material | Thermal conductivity (W/mK) | Flexural strength (MPa) | Relative substrate cost | Typical SiC use case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al₂O₃ 96% | 24–28 | 300–380 | 1× | Low-power SiC diodes, ≤150 °C |
| AlN | 170–200 | 300–350 | 4–6× | High-power SiC modules, EV inverters |
| Si₃N₄ | 80–90 | 650–800 | 6–10× | Traction modules, extreme thermal cycling |
Typical values for commercially available material, for comparison only. Confirm against the datasheet for your specific grade. Thermal conductivity at 20 °C per CoorsTek and Kyocera published datasheets.
AlN gives the best thermal performance per dollar for most SiC designs. Si₃N₄ costs more but survives 10–50× more thermal cycles (per Kyocera SN-90 data), which matters in automotive traction inverters where 15-year reliability is non-negotiable. For a deeper look at Si₃N₄ pricing, see the Si₃N₄ PCB cost analysis.
DBC bonds copper to ceramic at ~1,065 °C using a Cu–O eutectic. AMB uses a titanium-containing braze alloy at ~850 °C, which creates a stronger chemical bond and allows thicker copper (up to 1.0 mm or more). For SiC modules that cycle between –40 °C and 200 °C, AMB on Si₃N₄ is the highest-reliability option—and the most expensive.
| Parameter | DBC | AMB | Unit / Condition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max Cu thickness (standard) | 0.3 | 0.8–1.0 | mm |
| Bond strength | 8–12 | 15–25 | N/mm (peel test, per CeramTec) |
| Compatible substrates | Al₂O₃, AlN | Al₂O₃, AlN, Si₃N₄ | — |
| Relative process cost | 1× | 1.5–2.5× | same substrate, same Cu area |
| Thermal cycle life (ΔT = 200 K) | ~3,000 | >10,000 | cycles to delamination |
Values based on published data from CeramTec curamik and Rogers curamik product lines.
If your SiC module runs at ≤175 °C junction temperature and sees moderate cycling, DBC on AlN is often the sweet spot. For automotive-grade 200 °C+ cycling, AMB on Si₃N₄ pays for itself in warranty avoidance. The AlN PCB guide for SiC power modules covers material-specific design rules in more detail.
Assume a half-bridge SiC MOSFET module on a 50 × 36 mm substrate, 0.32 mm AlN, 0.3 mm DBC copper both sides, Ni/Au surface finish, quantity 1,000 pcs.
Switch the same design to AMB on Si₃N₄ with 0.8 mm copper, and the unit cost rises to roughly $22–$40, driven mainly by the Si₃N₄ panel cost ($120–$180) and the AMB process premium. For a broader view of how ceramic board pricing works across applications, the ceramic PCB design guide for SiC modules pairs well with this cost discussion.
Enter your substrate dimensions, material, copper method, and quantity to get a ballpark cost estimate for your SiC power module board.
[pcb_calc type=”pcb-quote”]

Setup charges—screen preparation, braze jig fabrication, etch tooling—are largely fixed. At 50 pieces, those charges can add $5–$15 per unit. At 5,000 pieces, they drop below $0.50 per unit. The crossover where ceramic substrates start to feel “affordable” is typically around 500–1,000 units for DBC and 1,000–2,000 units for AMB, depending on substrate size.
Negotiating annual blanket orders with scheduled releases is the most common way SiC module makers manage this. Panel-level shipping (unsingulated) also saves 5–10% vs. singulated delivery, if your assembly line can handle it.
Ceramic is not always the right call for SiC. Consider alternatives when:
At 1,000-piece volumes, expect $8–$15 for DBC on AlN and $22–$40 for AMB on Si₃N₄, for a typical 50 × 36 mm substrate. Prototypes (50 pcs) can run 3–5× higher per unit due to setup amortization.
AlN costs less upfront—roughly 4–6× the price of alumina vs. 6–10× for Si₃N₄. However, Si₃N₄ survives far more thermal cycles, so total cost of ownership is lower in applications with aggressive cycling, such as EV traction inverters with 15-year life requirements.
Yes, for SiC devices dissipating under ~30 W on a single die. Al₂O₃ 96% at 24–28 W/mK will bottleneck thermal performance above that level, forcing larger substrate area or active cooling that erases the material savings.
Going from 0.3 mm to 0.8 mm copper adds 40–80% to the metallization cost because of higher raw copper use and slower etching. It also narrows your process options: 0.8 mm Cu generally requires AMB rather than DBC, which itself carries a 1.5–2.5× process premium.
Most ceramic PCB manufacturers accept orders as low as 5–25 pieces for prototyping, though per-unit cost will be high. Production MOQs typically start at 100–500 pieces, depending on the factory. Panel-level orders (unsingulated) sometimes have lower effective MOQs because they reduce handling.
If you have a SiC module layout ready—or even a rough substrate size and power budget—upload your files for a Si₃N₄ substrate price quote or request a general ceramic PCB estimate. Comparing DBC-on-AlN against AMB-on-Si₃N₄ quotes side by side is the fastest way to make a material decision grounded in real numbers.